Sunday, November 12, 2006

Coburn Gets It

Rep. Mike Pence and Sen. Tom Coburn had some good postmortem analysis of the Election. Here is Coburn's:

“Although this election represents a short-term setback for Republicans, it could be an important turning point for the Republican Party and, more importantly, the country. Every incumbent was reminded that the American people, not party establishments, hold the reins of government. Throughout our history, when the American people rise up and force change our country benefits. In our system, the wisdom of many individual voters still outweighs the wisdom of a few,” Dr. Coburn said.

“Many factors contributed to these election results. The American people obviously are concerned about the conduct of the war in Iraq. Members of both parties have an obligation to work together to offer creative and constructive solutions that will help our troops accomplish their mission.

“The overriding theme of this election, however, is that voters are more interested in changing the culture in Washington than changing course in Washington, D.C. This election was not a rejection of conservative principles per se, but a rejection of corrupt, complacent and incompetent government.

“A recent CNN poll found that 54 percent of Americans believe government is doing too much while only 37 percent want government to do more. The results of this election reflect that attitude. Among the Republicans who lost their re-election bids a surprising number were political moderates who advocated a more activist government. Several Republican members of the appropriations committees, which have been on a spending binge, also were not re-elected. On the other hand, the two Republican senators who pulled off the most impressive victories were unapologetic conservatives, Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and John Ensign (R-NV). It is also notable that the Democrats who won or who ran competitive races sounded more like Ronald Reagan than Lyndon Johnson.

“This election does not show that voters have abandoned their belief in limited government; it shows that the Republican Party has abandoned them. In fact, these results represent the total failure of big government Republicanism.

“The Republican Party now has an opportunity to rediscover its identity as a party for limited government, free enterprise and individual responsibility. Most Americans still believe in these ideals, which reflect not merely the spirit of 1994 or the Reagan Revolution, but the vision of our founders. If Republicans present real ideas and solutions based on these principles we will do well in the future.

“What Republicans cannot continue to do, however, is more of the same. Our short-term, politically-expedient, bread and circus governing philosophy has failed. Iraq is an important issue in the minds of voters but it is not the only issue. Our majority was severely weakened by a long series of decisions that pre-date the public’s current concern about Iraq.

“Republicans oversaw a seven-fold increase in pork projects since 1998. Republicans increased domestic spending by nearly 50 percent since 2001, increased the national debt to $9 trillion, passed a reckless Medicare expansion bill and neglected our oversight responsibilities. While some of these decisions may have helped secure specific seats in the short-term the totality of our excess did not secure our majority, but destroy it.

“There should now be less doubt about whether overspending and pork projects are bad policy and bad politics. This year, in particular, pork did not save our vulnerable incumbents but helped drag them down. The challenges facing our country are too great and complex for members of Congress and their staff to continue to be distracted by endless earmarking.

“Some have said that Republicans and Democrats now need to govern from the middle. I disagree. We do not need to govern from the center as much as we need to govern from conscience. When politicians have the courage to argue their convictions and lose their political lives in an honest battle of ideas the best policies will prevail.

“The American people do want civility but they also want real debate. Civility does not mean an absence of conflict, but a return of honor and dignity in our politics. The great debates in American history like the Lincoln-Douglas debates or the debates about the Constitution were intensely confrontational, but no one feels soiled after reading them. That same quality of debate is possible today if politicians put their country first and party second. The problems facing our country are too great to not have these debates. Voters are bored and tired of partisan role playing in Washington. The answers to securing Iraq, winning the War on Terror, and preventing the impending bankruptcies of Medicare and Social Security will not be discovered by portraying the other party as the focus of evil and corruption. If we don’t debate these issues with honor and agree on solutions we will be the first generation of leaders that left the next generation worse off, and we will see our relative power in the world diminish.

“One of the great paradoxes in politics is that governing to maintain power is the surest way to lose it. Republicans have the ideas to solve our greatest challenges. If we focus on ideas, our majority status will take care of itself,” Dr. Coburn said.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks so much for posting this. PLEASE BLOG MORE!!! THIS COUNTRY NEEDS YOU!!!

8:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

AGAIN: PLEASE COME BACK!!!! No one else is calling for McCain to suspend his campaign for the good of the country.

YOUR VOICE IS NEEDED!!!

12:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you get the joke yet?

5:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The joke is John McCain as the Republican nominee. A more disgusting choice could not be made.

The joke is that the demented old man thinks he has a shot at winning the presidency.

He should retire to Florida with the rest of the liberal Democrats.

5:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, I'm afraid that the joke is actually the coalition of Birchers, isolationists and political neophytes who believe themselves to be the "base" of the party, rather than just part of a larger coalition.

Those screaming the loudest right now would have been in the Buchanan camp during the Reagan administration. But they don't know that. They think Reagan was universally loved by "real" conservatives, when the truth is, this same so-called "base" was calling Ronnie a "RINO", or phony conservative. They had a fit when he backed Ford, just like he'd have backed McCain if he were around today.

Tough having to swallow the crap fed to you by Hannity, Limbaugh and Coulter, eh? But don't let me interrupt you. Continue with your tantrum.

5:46 PM  
Blogger Valiant said...

Really funny joke. How did McVain work out for you? Eben Coburn has left the reservation!

9:26 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home